Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»  VoivodFan   » Technocratic Manipulators   » Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides
K
VoivodFan
Member # 6

posted June 08, 2004 13:37     Profile for K   Email K     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides
By Doug Thompson
Publisher
Capitol Hill Blue
6-4-4

President George W. Bush's increasingly erratic behavior and wide mood swings has the halls of the West Wing buzzing lately as aides privately express growing concern over their leader's state of mind.

In meetings with top aides and administration officials, the President goes from quoting the Bible in one breath to obscene tantrums against the media, Democrats and others that he classifies as "enemies of the state."

Worried White House aides paint a portrait of a man on the edge, increasingly wary of those who disagree with him and paranoid of a public that no longer trusts his policies in Iraq or at home.

"It reminds me of the Nixon days," says a longtime GOP political consultant with contacts in the White House. "Everybody is an enemy; everybody is out to get him. That's the mood over there."

In interviews with a number of White House staffers who were willing to talk off the record, a picture of an administration under siege has emerged, led by a man who declares his decisions to be "God's will" and then tells aides to "fuck over" anyone they consider to be an opponent of the administration.

"We're at war, there's no doubt about it. What I don't know anymore is just who the enemy might be," says one troubled White House aide. "We seem to spend more time trying to destroy John Kerry than al Qaeda and our enemies list just keeps growing and growing."

Aides say the President gets "hung up on minor details," micromanaging to the extreme while ignoring the bigger picture. He will spend hours personally reviewing and approving every attack ad against his Democratic opponent and then kiss off a meeting on economic issues.

"This is what is killing us on Iraq," one aide says. "We lost focus. The President got hung up on the weapons of mass destruction and an unproven link to al Qaeda. We could have found other justifiable reasons for the war but the President insisted the focus stay on those two, tenuous items."

Aides who raise questions quickly find themselves shut out of access to the President or other top advisors. Among top officials, Bush's inner circle is shrinking. Secretary of State Colin Powell has fallen out of favor because of his growing doubts about the administration's war against Iraq.

The President's abrupt dismissal of CIA Directory George Tenet Wednesday night is, aides say, an example of how he works.

"Tenet wanted to quit last year but the President got his back up and wouldn't hear of it," says an aide. "That would have been the opportune time to make a change, not in the middle of an election campaign but when the director challenged the President during the meeting Wednesday, the President cut him off by saying 'that's it George. I cannot abide disloyalty. I want your resignation and I want it now.'"

Tenet was allowed to resign "voluntarily" and Bush informed his shocked staff of the decision Thursday morning. One aide says the President actually described the decision as "God's will."

God may also be the reason Attorney General John Ashcroft, the administration's lightning rod because of his questionable actions that critics argue threatens freedoms granted by the Constitution, remains part of the power elite. West Wing staffers call Bush and Ashcroft "the Blues Brothers" because "they're on a mission from God."

"The Attorney General is tight with the President because of religion," says one aide. "They both believe any action is justifiable in the name of God."

But the President who says he rules at the behest of God can also tongue-lash those he perceives as disloyal, calling them "fucking assholes" in front of other staff, berating one cabinet official in front of others and labeling anyone who disagrees with him "unpatriotic" or "anti-American."

"The mood here is that we're under siege, there's no doubt about it," says one troubled aide who admits he is looking for work elsewhere. "In this administration, you don't have to wear a turban or speak Farsi to be an enemy of the United States. All you have to do is disagree with the President."

The White House did not respond to requests for comment on the record.

© Copyright 2004 Capitol Hill Blue
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_4636.shtml


 |  IP: Logged
Megz
VoivodFan
Member # 367

posted June 08, 2004 14:16     Profile for Megz   Email Megz     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
From the Capitol Hill Blue FAQ:

"Don't you take anything seriously?
Nah, we leave that to the politicians (and some of our readers). They take everything, including themselves, far too seriously."

--------------------

ummm.....I got nothin' today :-(


 |  IP: Logged
LyKcantropen
VoivodFan
Member # 162

posted June 08, 2004 15:32     Profile for LyKcantropen   Email LyKcantropen     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I preferred this article. It had substance.

"Political Hate Is A Two-Way Street"

Those who decry the ever-increasing criticism of President George W. Bush all too often claim hate drives those who disagree with his war in Iraq or his other actions in the White House.
Some who find fault with the President defend their criticism as payback for the bitter and personal campaign that Republicans waged against former President Bill Clinton and his wife (now Senator) Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And, yes, some of the campaign against the Clintons came from hate just as some of the barbs now directed at Bush spring from personal animosity.

Unfortunately, hate is all too pervasive in modern American politics (as well as many other parts of life) and hate is a two-way street.

Visit most conservative computer bulletin boards (like Free Republic) and you will find gobs of hate directed at Democrats in general and John F. Kerry in particular. Then venture over to a left-leaning board like Democratic Underground and you will find pretty much the same rhetoric directed at Republicans and George W. Bush.

Reasoned political debate is a lost commodity in America, replaced by shouting and invectives. We all fall into the trap of resorting to name calling when it comes to politics.

But neither side of the political spectrum can claim the moral high ground.

To date, President Bush’s re-election campaign has run 49,050 negative television and radio ads in the top 100 broadcast markets – 75 percent of the campaign’s total ads. Since the advent of broadcast political advertising, no incumbent President before Bush has ever run so many ads attacking his opponent (by comparison Kerry’s campaign has run 13,336 negative ads – 27 percent of his total broadcast campaign).

Bush’s negative barrage destroys the previous record of incumbent President Lyndon B. Johnson’s campaign against Barry Goldwater by an astounding 457 percent!

And, according to the Campaign Media Analysis Group, three-quarters of the Bush attacks against Kerry are either dead wrong or highly misleading (as are about half of Kerry’s ads against Bush).

While the sheer volume of negative ads might be surprising, especially coming from the man who once called himself a “compassionate conservative,” the domination of misinformation in a national political campaign is not.

Disinformation is a fact of life in politics. Those who practice politics for a living call it “spin.” Honest people call it lying through your teeth.

Add hate to the rising tide of lies and you quickly understand why an increasing number of voting-age Americans tell pollsters they may stay home in November because they are disgusting with the current system for choosing our nation’s leaders.

They should be disgusted. You can’t turn on the radio without hearing right-wing hate mongers like Michael Savage telling homosexuals to “shut up and die” or left-wing propagandists like Michael Moore saying National Rifle Association members should be killed with their own guns.

Take a hard look at the misinformation spewed out by the Sean Hannitys, Rush Limbaughs, Al Frankens or Michael Moores and you see why those who follow their rants can’t make an informed decision.

I’ve had partisans from both the right and the left tell me they only read or listen to those whose political bias matches their own. How can anyone truly understand what is happening in the world when their only source of news comes from admittedly biased sources?

And how can either side of this debacle keep a straight face when they accuse the other side of preaching misinformation and hate?

The next time someone from either the right or the left accuses the other side of the of preaching hate, don’t waste your trying to reason with them. Just shake your head and walk away.

In American politics, the only thing more pervasive than hate is pure, old-fashioned, bald-faced hypocrisy.


 |  IP: Logged

All times are ET  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | VoivodFan

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.04